Aloha and Good morning! (^^) Another fine Sunday morning in Hawaii. Just got back from dropping off "Da Boss" at work and the usual visit to the Farmer's Market for this week's vegetables. Got to support the local farmers!
Today I want to touch on the different styles of teaching. My teaching methods have evolved over the 40 some years of Judo and Karate. My military and LE experience definitely had an impact on my teaching.
In recent years you see a lot of hype using terms such as "reality based"; "live or aliveness" in an effort to pitch their particular style of martial arts. Many, not all, often pooh pahs so-called "traditional martial arts" as being far removed from "reality" and are basically useless. Many of these "gurus" of "reality" and "liveliness"
claim (note: I am not questioning their bios) having trained in a traditional style and found it lacking.
I have to chuckle at such statements. They definitely did not train under the "traditional" instructors I grew up with.
First of all, I need to have the readers understand
my basic premise of Budo. "Futatsu no Hoko wo tomeru" or to stop conflict. Through training in your chosen martial art or for that matter, any non-martial art such as Tea Ceremony, Line Dancing, Spelunking (I still remember the "panic" when I got stuck in a narrow passage way of a cave, Gahahaha), etc. you develop of sense of confidence and also the ability to respect others and to understand that nothing is gained from violence, hate, bigotry and jealously. In extension, you follow a peaceful life and naturally do not get into situations that may harm you. Yet, in times of emergency you have the confidence to deal with issues and resolve them in a
peaceful manner.
Some may say "You must be dreaming! Get real!" Well, aside from situations dictated by my military and LE careers, I have never really had the need to resort to my martial arts training. The only injuries I received was from line of duty. So back to the topic of "aliveness/reality styles of teaching"
Way before BJJ or MMA became popular my Judo Sensei, Sakabe 8th Dan, would at times take us aside and show us the "dark side" of Judo. The techniques banned in modern Judo competition or perhaps we should call it the "roots of Judo". The various joint locks and chokes, methods of entry and escape. Perhaps his experience in the Japanese Imperial Navy had something to do with it. So when I read articles on BJJ and MMA I chuckle again. (^^) After all, BJJ origins stem from Judo/Jujitsu. I recall being at Narita International Airport and over hearing a young Japanese Judoka stating that he was flying to Brazil to learn BJJ. Hmmm. I guess there are not many Sakabe Senseis left in Japan?
When I trained in Okinawa it was certainly "alive" as it is popularly called these days. Now I am not talking about "yakusoku kumite" or pre-arranged sets. The kicks were low and always aimed at the knee joints or groin. Head shots, well, lets just say it was yourresponsibility not to get hit. Way before Kyokushin gained popularity "full contact" existed in Okinawa. So once again I chuckle when I read comments with regard to the "lack of reality" in traditional arts. Did you know the ankle hold/break exists in Heian Four and Five katas? Try it during a kumite session one day and you will see how much more you need to practice your kata! (^^) Now that is what I would call aliveness training, applying techniques from kata into jiyu kumite.
One big gripe I have with Kyokushinkai. They popularized the phrase "Jissen" 実戦 or "Real Fighting".
This phrase I feel is too misused. After all, what is Jissen. Certainly the style of Kyokushin tournament fighting is far cry from "Reality". Reality is the environment we place ourselves in, not the martial art.